Holder Argues for Homeland Drone Killings
The attorney general told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday that the president has the authority to use drones to kill American citizens on U.S. soil in the event of an "extraordinary circumstance."
The attorney general told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday that the president has the authority to use drones to kill American citizens on U.S. soil in the event of an “extraordinary circumstance.”
“The president could conceivably have no choice but to authorize the military to use such force if necessary to protect the homeland,” Holder said.
— Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.
Your support matters…The Telegraph:
Mr Holder stressed in his letter that the prospect of a president considering the assassination of an American citizen on US soil was “entirely hypothetical” and “unlikely to occur”.
Yet “it is possible, I suppose, to imagine an extraordinary circumstance in which it would be necessary and appropriate under the constitution and applicable laws of the United States for the president to authorise the military to use lethal force within the territory of the United States,” he wrote.
Appearing in front the Senate judiciary committee on Wednesday, Mr Holder reiterated that “the government has no intention to carry out any drone strikes in the United States”.
Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.
You can help level the playing field. Become a member.
Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what's really happening- without compromise.
Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.
Military
As DOD integrates artificial intelligence into military operations, concerns rise over ethics, transparency, and unintended consequences.
Opinion
President Biden's rules on drone warfare mask continued violent Islamophobia.
Politics
Obama's only takeaway from the Syria episode was to never again seek Congressional approval for military action.
The president’s foreign policy seldom matches his anti-war rhetoric. In 2020, it’s incumbent on his opposition to offer a true alternative.
There’s a lot about our wars that we don’t know, but what we do know is enough to make a person cry.
The president's 2020 opponents would do well to watch his moves on the international front, as they could help his re-election cause.
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.