The Rehabbing of a Racist Former City Council President
Why does the LAist think Angelenos care what Nury Martinez has to say?As Angelenos countdown to the creepiest night of the year, many U.S. news sources continue their creep to the right.
The LAist is one of these outlets.
This regional news source, which claims to be “full of the values that drive LA,” recently promoted a reactionary-studded debate at downtown LA’s Ace Hotel moderated by Bari Weiss, the self-canceled New York Times opinion editor and columnist who now publishes an “anti-Woke” Substack named Free Press. LAist staff condemned management’s decision to advertise the Sept. 13 event, protesting with a public statement that argued Weiss’s Free Press was at odds with their employer’s commitment to “fact-based journalism.” They further characterized Weiss’s Substack as a source of “misinformation about transgender youth” and “harmful anti-trans rhetoric.”
On Sept. 20, the LAist caused another stir when it announced the launch of a four-part podcast, “Imperfect Paradise,” advertised as a “deep dive into the LA City Council Tape Scandal” that features “an exclusive interview with former LA City Council President Nury Martinez.” The unsmiling photo of Martinez that accompanies the announcement on the LAist’s website has a strangely religious quality to it. Add an aura and the portrait could be that of a martyred saint on a prayer card.
But Martinez is neither martyr nor saint. She’s a conniving pol and a creep who was justly ousted because of her racism, xenophobia and classism. On Oct. 9, 2022, an audio recording of a backroom dealmaking session that happened in 2021 was leaked to the public. It captured Martinez insulting and mocking Black people, Indigenous migrants, children, adoptees, Jews, Armenians and tenants.
The crude us-versus-them distinctions reflected the central message of Carl Schmitt, the Nazi legal theorist, who wrote that the “political distinction to which political actions and motives can be reduced is that between friend and enemy.” The tape, which lasts more than an hour, painfully inventories Martinez’s political friends and enemies. In dismissing the progressive district attorney George Gascón, Martinez says, “Fuck that guy…He’s with the Blacks.” Referring to Jews as “Judíos,” Martinez huffs, “they cut their deal with South LA.”
While much has been made of Martinez’s use of slurs, her involvement in gerrymandering schemes to protect and bolster Latino political interests underscores her willingness to participate in systemic racism and undermine democracy. That she is Latina in no way excuses her behavior.
Martinez resigned under pressure — including calls from the White House to step down — but her departure was not accompanied by an apology. Instead, the disgraced politician released an egocentric statement that began by emphasizing her “broken heart.” She then pivoted to extolling her many civic accomplishments. The most audacious part of Martinez’s resignation letter appears at the end, where she writes, “And last, to all the little Latina girls across this city — I hope I’ve inspired you to dream beyond that which you can see.”
When I first read that line, I thought, “Bitch, what?”
I don’t have children; I have a cat. But if I had a daughter, I would be direct in my warning to her: Don’t you dare draw inspiration from fashy women like Nury Martinez. It doesn’t matter if they look like you or sound like you. Fascism is deadly and we don’t play with it. In this household, we are anti-fascists.
After Martinez resigned, I listened to other Latinas speculate about her future, about what she might do with her career now that the world knows who she really is. Some predicted that she might re-brand herself as a right-wing Latina and join the GOP. She already wears an assault rifle lapel pin to work, and the year she was outed as bigot, a record 43 Republican Latina candidates ran for House seats. Among them was Anna Paulina Luna, the first Mexican-American elected to represent Florida in the House of Representatives.
Luna is a purveyor of lies, large and small. She has claimed that her father, George Mayerhofer, was a convicted felon who spent time incarcerated in various California jails and prisons. But when The Washington Post investigated Luna’s statements, reporters found no records that corroborated her stories. When the Post’s reporters looked into Luna’s claim that she had survived a “home invasion,” they found that the representative’s version of events contradicted the recollections of her former roommate. Luna’s strangest claim is a religious one: that her father was a practicing Jew. Luna’s extended family insists that George Mayerhofer was the Catholic son of a Nazi soldier, Heinrich Mayerhofer. Given Luna’s genealogy, it seems that the manzana hasn’t fallen far from the tree.
Federico Finchelstein, a historian of fascism, has noted that while all politicians lie, fascists do so on an epic scale. Night becomes day. The moon becomes the sun. Liars tell the truth. Nury Martinez becomes a misunderstood martyr. By handing her the microphone, reporters give a dangerous person the opportunity to rehabilitate her image and escape the consequences of her actions. When an audiotape revealed that right-wing activist Richard Spencer was indeed a white supremacist and neo-Nazi, the media turned from him, not toward him. Spencer had already shown us who he was. To put a microphone in front of him would have presented him the opportunity to spread more propaganda, misinformation and lies. Nury Martinez deserves no such gift.
Your support matters…Independent journalism is under threat and overshadowed by heavily funded mainstream media.
You can help level the playing field. Become a member.
Your tax-deductible contribution keeps us digging beneath the headlines to give you thought-provoking, investigative reporting and analysis that unearths what's really happening- without compromise.
Give today to support our courageous, independent journalists.
I understand your view that giving Nury a platform in public discourse is dangerous. However, so far the podcast, which is in its 2nd episode as of today, has focused on contextualizing the scandal as an event that weighs on Los Angeles politics and Latinx history and on considering Nury as an individual whose politics and views on class and race developed within the specific context of the immigrant community in Pacoima. My sense is...
I understand your view that giving Nury a platform in public discourse is dangerous. However, so far the podcast, which is in its 2nd episode as of today, has focused on contextualizing the scandal as an event that weighs on Los Angeles politics and Latinx history and on considering Nury as an individual whose politics and views on class and race developed within the specific context of the immigrant community in Pacoima. My sense is that the posdcast is less about Nury as a person as much as the person itself tells a larger story about Latinx politics and power in the U.S. more generally. I find the podcast interesting because I think it is important to take seriously the complexity of what Latinidad means, how it relates to immigration, nationalism, capitalism, and heteronormative ideologies that often venture into right wing values. While canceling racists has political value and they should not themselves be rehabilitated as people, my sense is that this podcast is less of a "gift" than it is an opportunity to contextualize the operation of racism and conservative ideology as much an integral part of Latinidad as are left wing movements. To assume that white supremacy in minorities is an erratum in right-wing movements is dangerous since it fails to consider how Latinidad is itself a identity that can be assimilated into left and right wing movements. How is it possible that 3 Latinos in the LA city cancel with such views are granted power to begin with? Is it not for this reason urgent to open up conversations and ask "how is this possible?" rather than simply cancel and refuse to hear from people like Nury? It is one thing to debate these people and give their beliefs a platform in political discourse, and it is in this sense that one should not provide Spencer or Nury the opportunity to defend their beliefs. However, Imperfect Paradise does no such thing and I think is opening up an important conversation about uncomfortable ideological strains within the Latino community itself since if it happens in LA it can happen anywhere in the country.