What Earl Warren Was Thinking
An interview with the jurist whose court presided over the major decisions now being undone by a conservative court.
Earl Warren, right, smiles broadly as he talks to Governor Edmund G. Brown during a visit to the governor's office in Sacramento, California, January 5, 1966. AP Photo.
This is Part of the "The Supreme Court’s War on the Future" Dig series
This is a 1969 interview with the legendary Chief Justice Earl Warren just before his retirement conducted by the McClatchy Broadcasting Service.
Warren served as chief justice from 1953 to 1969. Under his stewardship, the high court expanded the scope of civil rights and civil liberties, issuing such landmark decisions as Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, ending legal segregation in public schools; Loving v. Virginia, declaring anti-miscegenation laws unconstitutional; Griswold v. Connecticut, recognizing a general right to privacy; Baker v. Carr, establishing the principle of “one person, one vote”; Miranda v. Arizona, requiring police to advise criminal suspects of their right to remain silent; and South Carolina v. Katzenbach, upholding the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
These precedents, and many others, are under attack by the current Supreme Court, which is dominated by six hardcore judicial conservatives.
Your support is crucial...As we navigate an uncertain 2025, with a new administration questioning press freedoms, the risks are clear: our ability to report freely is under threat.
Your tax-deductible donation enables us to dig deeper, delivering fearless investigative reporting and analysis that exposes the reality beneath the headlines — without compromise.
Now is the time to take action. Stand with our courageous journalists. Donate today to protect a free press, uphold democracy and uncover the stories that need to be told.
During a heated Democratic debate, the California senator confronts the former vice president over his opposition to busing and more.
The Senate has given a lifetime appointment to an ideologue and alleged sexual abuser, completing the right's judicial counterrevolution.
Aaron Persky, who gave a short sentence to a college athlete, is at the center of a public disagreement involving law professors.
Where adults have failed repeatedly, and many have simply given up, the youth are now leading the charge.
Despite efforts to sanitize the real King, the radical King, the fight to end his "three evils"—racism, poverty and militarism—continues today.
In one now-historic decade, civil rights organizers brilliantly identified the levers of government power they could seize, but most of those levers are out of reach today. How will modern activists achieve change?
You need to be a supporter to comment.
There are currently no responses to this article.
Be the first to respond.